48. Pursey K, Burrows TL, Stanwell P, Collins Ce. Just how particular are web-built mind-claimed height, lbs, and the body mass list when you look at the teenagers? J Med Web sites Res. (2014) 16:e4. doi: /jmir.2909
44. Beasley TM, Schumaker Re. Multiple regression way of analysing contingency tables: Blog post hoc and you can arranged comparison methods. J Exp Educ. (1995) –93. doi: 797
50. Culbert Kilometres, Racine SE, Klump KL. Lookup opinion: what we should have discovered concerning factors behind dinner issues – a great synthesis from sociocultural, emotional, and you can biological browse. J Boy Psychol Psychiatry. (2015) –64. doi: /jcpp.12441
51. Oldham M, Robinson Age. Visual human anatomy proportions norms and the below-identification of heavy and you may being obese. Obes Sci Pract. (2018) 4:29–forty. doi: /osp4.143
52. Robinson Elizabeth, Parretti H, Aveyard P. Graphic character away from being obese from the healthcare pros: an experimental examination of trainee and you will accredited GPs. Br J Gen Pract. (2014) 64:e703–8. doi: /bjgp14X682285
53. Robinson E, Kersbergen We. Over weight or just around correct? a norm assessment explanation regarding observed weight condition. Obes Sci Pract. (2017) 3:36–43. doi: /osp4.89
54. Ruhl Roentgen, Peterson JL, Luedicke. Promoting otherwise stigmatising? personal perceptions away from lbs-related words employed by health providers. Int J Obesity. (2013) –19. Continue reading “Cooper PJ, Taylor MJ, Cooper Z, Fairburn CG”